In case you have been sleeping for the past decade, there has been a big controversy over stem cell research - particularly that using embryonic stem cells. Its been a bit of a roller coaster - yes it can be federally funded, no it cant, yes it can, no it cant... and now its waiting on a Supreme Court decision.
The research itself does get into some ground breaking stuff - diabetes, cancer, etc. Its also expensive - $200 million this year alone. But apparently the scientists doing the research are worrying about their jobs. Well yes that is a concern. Anyone's job can just go away. There are no guarantees for any job these days.
A few thoughts here:
Isn't the idea that ground breaking research might be put on hold a bit more disconcerting than the fact that 1300 people might have to find new jobs? No one wants to lose their job but let's not lose sight of the fact that the research might be more important than the jobs?
Why is it a given that the federal government should fund this research? Regardless of the embryonic or other stem cells issue, is the federal government supposed to fund this? I am sure the government funds all sorts of things but who thinks they are required to fund this in the first place? What if they had to get other funding like a lot of other research does?
I am not questioning the right or wrong about the research. But is the government supposed to fund research? Why are they supposed to fund it - because they always did? Even if the Supreme Court allows it, what if the budget didn't have room for to fund it?
I don't know but I think something is a little out of whack here. Its not about jobs. Its about research and breakthroughs. Its about coping with change if needed.
I wouldn't be worried about my job. I would be more worried if research was derailed. Even if they get funding, from whatever source, they could still lose their job.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I Started a New Blog
I started this blog when I was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007. Blogging really helped me cope with my cancer and its treatment. Howe...
-
I started this blog when I was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007. Blogging really helped me cope with my cancer and its treatment. Howe...
-
This is the misunderstood side of my life - how I live with limitations. The other day, I visited my mother who also has RA. We went for a w...
-
Yesterday I had a (not so fun) back procedure. As my arm has been acting up, I wore my lymphedema sleeve on my left arm. I am going to the l...
2 comments:
Please post this descriptive event to your site in support for Breast Cancer. Every bit of awareness helps!
BENEFIT FOR THE BROOKLYN BREAST CANCER PROGRAM AT MAIMONIDES CANCER CENTER:
Be an honored guest and join Dr. Patrick I. Borgen, Director of the Brooklyn Breast Cancer Program, for an evening to benefit the Brooklyn Breast Cancer Program at Maimonides Medical Center. Taking place, Thursday October 21, 2010, at the Brooklyn Museum (200 Eastern Parkway), the event will begin at 6:00 PM with cocktails, light supper, and a gallery tour, followed by a delightful program at 7:30 PM. Special recognition will be paid to breast cancer activists, Stewart Krentzman and Sandra van den Broek. Put on your festive business attire and come be a part of a great evening and an important cause. Don’t forget to jazz up with some PINK! For information about sponsorship opportunities or ticket pricing please contact the Benefit Office at 212.675.9474 (ext 14), or: nlevinson@sualtd.com.
Unfortunately, Caroline, private foundations and private money usually only fund projects that are proven concepts or ones that have a huge potential profit margin. The reason why the government funds a lot of research is to encourage cutting edge research - although even that declined recenly when the Republic government was in power. Also, the government funding agencies try very hard to have objective experts judge the merits of the proposals since it is funded by taxpayer dollars. I don't know about private foundation funding - but the potential for abuse and favoritism is probably higher in those cases - in other words, getting funding for such research is more a matter of WHO you know rather than WHAT you know.
Post a Comment