There is a new bill in Massachusetts which would require pharmaceutical manufacturers to disclose their costs in order to justify high prices on new medications. Hmmmm.... Do you think it would fly? I hope it would.
"An alliance of lawmakers, consumers, and health insurers is pushing for a
law that would force biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies to
justify their prices by disclosing how much they spend on research,
production, and marketing. It also would allow the state’s Health Policy
Commission to limit the prices of especially costly drugs, something
not done anywhere in the country...."
"The bill cites “substantial public interest” in what goes into the
prices of such medicines. Drug makers would be required to disclose,
among other things, their development and marketing outlays, how much
research was paid for with public funds, their manufacturing costs, and
the prices of their drugs in other countries. It would also empower the
commission, which is charged with holding down health care costs, to
impose cost controls on some high-priced drugs."
Of course the pharma companies are not too happy about this. They claim it would reduce innovation. Okay, I get it. They don't want anyone snooping into their finances. But as far as I am concerned, if they get public funding, they need to be open about their pricing and use of the money.
If they choose not to get public funding, which they all do, then as far as I am concerned, there would need to be a bit more justification for the prices.
For decades, pharma manufacturers have been able to set their prices and the US has not negotiated with them, leaving Americans pinched by high prices. In recent years, new medications have cost tens or hundreds of thousands each year per patient for rare cancers or other ailments.
Someone has to create an onus for the manufacturers to justify their prices instead of just allowing them to ask for what they want. They try to justify it by saying their costs are high and hardly anyone pays the full prices because of insurance coverage or discounts from the manufacturers. That just isn't enough. They need to provide some kind of back up for their requests.
Okay, that's just my 2 cents, as usual.
And they won't review all the tests. This is a two part misadventure. First I was horrified by this first story where two women were f...
As part of the universal pinkification of October, Good Housekeeping magazine has a section on breast cancer (who knew?). But one thing they...
Okay, I am done. I do not care what about any more news about what can or can't cause breast cancer. I am done. The latest info is that ...
About a year ago, I met a young woman who had had cancer since age 18 when she was diagnosed with an inherited pancreatic cancer. She had ne...