Australia's Federal Court has allowed companies to patent genes. This is contrary to what recently happened in the US Supreme Court. Why? I say, why? What were they thinking?
The only piece of logic I can find here is this:
"Director of Advocacy at Cancer Council Australia, Paul Grogan, said
that, if the ruling was an interpretation of the law, then the law
needed to change.
"In 2008, Australian women were only protected from an
attempted commercial monopoly over the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tests because the
company that threatened to take those tests away from public
laboratories withdrew its patent claims voluntarily," he said.
"There was nothing in the law to protect healthcare consumers ... and there still isn't.
He said Australia might now end up finding US companies
enforcing patents here that they could not enforce in their home country
after a Supreme Court ruling there that overturned the gene patents."
It is also expected to bring companies to Australia where they can patent human genes.
I agree it may be time to change the laws.
And they won't review all the tests. This is a two part misadventure. First I was horrified by this first story where two women were f...
As part of the universal pinkification of October, Good Housekeeping magazine has a section on breast cancer (who knew?). But one thing they...
Okay, I am done. I do not care what about any more news about what can or can't cause breast cancer. I am done. The latest info is that ...
About a year ago, I met a young woman who had had cancer since age 18 when she was diagnosed with an inherited pancreatic cancer. She had ne...