[Did you take the survey yet on who reads blogs? There's still time. I'm sure you meant to go back and complete it later so here is a gentle reminder. You only have 9 more days. Go take the damn survey! http://fluidsurveys.com/s/blogimpact/]
So I am pleasantly surprised to learn about this new blood test that can detect cancer without a biopsy. They call it a liquid biopsy. Basically it means that they hope that cancer can be detected before its noticeable. This is not the same as the blood biopsy I blogged about the other day for breast cancer. This is something else that is new.
It has been tested on patients with lymphoma and one woman with lung cancer.
"The hope is that a blood draw — far less onerous than a traditional
biopsy or a CT scan — will enable oncologists to quickly figure out
whether a treatment is working and, if it is, to continue monitoring in
case the cancer develops resistance. Failing treatments could be ended
quickly, sparing patients side effects and allowing doctors to try
This means that patients wont have to wait for months to see if their cancer treatment is working. They can be monitored through blood tests. And recurrences of lymphoma were detected three months before they were noticeable.
Of course more research is needed but things look good. Personally, while I am not a fan of too much blood work, I much prefer them to other tests or biopsies.
You may know I live outside Boston, MA. We had two 'little' snow storms in a row. The news is that we lost power from 10pm Wednesday...
As part of the universal pinkification of October, Good Housekeeping magazine has a section on breast cancer (who knew?). But one thing they...
About a year ago, I met a young woman who had had cancer since age 18 when she was diagnosed with an inherited pancreatic cancer. She had ne...
I often wonder in cancer treatment, which is worse - treatment or complications? I think complications win that one. To me complications mea...